Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
has assertion: assertion
has provenance: provenance
has publication info: pubinfo
type: Nanopublication
created: 2026-05-19T13:45:44.188+02:00
creator: RoCrateBot
type: FAIRDigitalObject
type: RoCrateNanopub

Ecology
type: DefinedTerm

Generation Service
type: Agent
type: Person

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
type: organization

bibliographic reference
type: Concept

CNR-ISMAR
type: organization

European Union
type: Organization

ecology
type: Domain

EU member states
type: Expression

EU
type: Concept

results
type: Concept

costs
type: Concept

benefits
type: Concept

social assessment
type: Expression

newspaper
type: Concept
norm score: 2.896642527978934
score: 4.4

value
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.179982440737489
score: 5.9

choice
type: Concept
norm score: 3.686635944700461
score: 5.6

trade
type: Domain
norm score: 10.150375939849624
score: 2.7

marine environment
type: Lemma
norm score: 4.302019315188763
score: 4.9

International organisation
type: IPTC
path: Politics/International relations/International organisation

Metal
type: IPTC
path: Economy, business and finance/Market and exchange/Commodity market/Metal

cost
type: Lemma
norm score: 6.409130816505707
score: 7.3

environmental sciences
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.9905787110328674

member state
type: Concept
norm score: 3.1599736668861094
score: 4.8

European Union
type: Organization
wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q458

the economy
type: Domain
norm score: 39.849624060150376
score: 10.6

geophysics
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.5096724629402161

newspaper
type: Concept
norm score: 2.896642527978934
score: 4.4

EU member states
type: Phrase
norm score: 15.450121654501215
score: 25.4

Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
type: Sentence
norm score: 21.142520612485274
score: 35.9

value
type: Concept
norm score: 4.3449637919684
score: 6.6

EU member states
type: Phrase
norm score: 15.32846715328467
score: 25.2

cost
type: Concept
norm score: 5.464121132323898
score: 8.3

geophysics
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.5096724629402161

germanium
type: Concept
norm score: 2.699144173798551
score: 4.1

choice experiment methodology
type: Phrase
norm score: 14.598540145985401
score: 24.0

choice experiment methodology
type: Phrase
norm score: 14.416058394160583
score: 23.7

experiment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6208031599736668
score: 5.5

benefit
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.7945566286215975
score: 6.6

European Union
type: Concept
norm score: 9.01909150757077
score: 13.7

cost
type: Lemma
norm score: 6.4969271290605795
score: 7.4

European Union
type: Lemma
norm score: 10.272168568920105
score: 11.7

Environment
type: IPTC
path: Environment

environmental sciences
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.9905787110328674

member state
type: Concept
norm score: 3.2258064516129035
score: 4.9

value
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.179982440737489
score: 5.9

marine environment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6208031599736668
score: 5.5

Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 12.291483757682176
score: 14.0

value
type: Concept
norm score: 4.3449637919684
score: 6.6

costs of degradation
type: Phrase
norm score: 4.014598540145985
score: 6.6

cost
type: Concept
norm score: 5.464121132323898
score: 8.3

achievement of good
type: Phrase
norm score: 1.7639902676399026
score: 2.9

choice
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6208031599736668
score: 5.5

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Phrase
norm score: 14.355231143552311
score: 23.6

the economy
type: Domain
norm score: 39.849624060150376
score: 10.6

https://w3id.org/ro-id/8eb5b40e-3841-4c4e-8976-c1c1beaa9205
name: This paper uses the choice experiment methodology to estimate the value of the non-market benefits associated with the achievement of good (marine) environmental status (GES) as specified in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires that the 'costs of degradation' (the benefits foregone if GES is not achieved) be considered within a broader 'Economic and Social Assessment' of the marine environment by EU member states.
type: Sentence
norm score: 20.082449941107182
score: 34.1

environmental science and management
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.9905787110328674

trade
type: Domain
norm score: 10.150375939849624
score: 2.7

Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
type: Sentence
norm score: 21.142520612485274
score: 35.9

Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 12.37928007023705
score: 14.1

experiment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6208031599736668
score: 5.5

Metal
type: IPTC
path: Economy, business and finance/Market and exchange/Commodity market/Metal

benefit
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.88235294117647
score: 6.7

Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.618964003511852
score: 6.4

achievement of good
type: Phrase
norm score: 1.8248175182481752
score: 3.0

Environment
type: IPTC
path: Environment

geosciences
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.5096724629402161

benefit
type: Concept
norm score: 4.937458854509545
score: 7.5

service-account-enrichment
type: Agent

Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
performs task: bibliographic reference
about: Ecology
content size: 4768
contributor: Generation Service
copyright holder: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
creator: Generation Service
date created: 2018-06-20 11:25:52.718000+00:00
date modified: 2025-03-05 02:49:06.880678+00:00
date published: 2018-06-20 11:25:52.718000+00:00
description: This paper uses the choice experiment methodology to estimate the value of the non-market benefits associated with the achievement of good (marine) environmental status (GES) as specified in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires that the 'costs of degradation' (the benefits foregone if GES is not achieved) be considered within a broader 'Economic and Social Assessment' of the marine environment by EU member states. Assessing the costs of degradation as defined by the MSFD implies that changes in marine ecosystem services provided in each State should be analysed. The results show that there are high values attached with changes to the state of the marine environment by the Irish general public. The results of a random parameters logit model also demonstrate that preferences are heterogeneous, with changes in certain marine attributes generating both positive and negative utilities. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
encoding format: application/ld+json
end time: 2014-12-01
license: no-permission
distribution category: Open access
type: ResearchObject
type: LiveRO
type: Dataset
type: BibliographyResearchObject
generated at time: 2014-12-01
domain: trade
domain: the economy
organization: European Union
concept: newspaper
concept: choice
concept: member state
concept: value
concept: cost
concept: germanium
concept: experiment
concept: European Union
concept: marine environment
concept: benefit
field of research: environmental sciences
field of research: environmental science and management
IPTC: International organisation
IPTC: Metal
IPTC: Environment
lemma: value
lemma: marine environment
lemma: cost
lemma: benefit
lemma: European Union
lemma: Marine Strategy Framework Directive
lemma: Strategy Framework Directive
NASA: geophysics
NASA: geosciences
phrase: EU member states
phrase: choice experiment methodology
phrase: costs of degradation
phrase: achievement of good
phrase: EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Phrase
norm score: 14.233576642335766
score: 23.4

European Union
type: Lemma
norm score: 10.272168568920105
score: 11.7

geosciences
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.5096724629402161

environmental science and management
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.9905787110328674

benefit
type: Concept
norm score: 4.937458854509545
score: 7.5

costs of degradation
type: Phrase
norm score: 4.014598540145985
score: 6.6

marine environment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.5549703752468726
score: 5.4

Assessing the costs of degradation as defined by the MSFD implies that changes in marine ecosystem services provided in each State should be analysed.
type: Sentence
norm score: 8.775029446407538
score: 14.9

marine environment
type: Lemma
norm score: 4.302019315188763
score: 4.9

https://w3id.org/ro-id/f1dd434e-7f6e-476b-8c3f-d2f24a0aec20
name: This paper uses the choice experiment methodology to estimate the value of the non-market benefits associated with the achievement of good (marine) environmental status (GES) as specified in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires that the 'costs of degradation' (the benefits foregone if GES is not achieved) be considered within a broader 'Economic and Social Assessment' of the marine environment by EU member states.
type: Sentence
norm score: 20.082449941107182
score: 34.1

Assessing the costs of degradation as defined by the MSFD implies that changes in marine ecosystem services provided in each State should be analysed.
type: Sentence
norm score: 8.775029446407538
score: 14.9

Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.618964003511852
score: 6.4

International organisation
type: IPTC
path: Politics/International relations/International organisation

European Union
type: Concept
norm score: 9.01909150757077
score: 13.7

European Union
type: Organization
wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q458

service-account-generation-service
type: Agent

sig
has algorithm: RSA
signed by: RoCrateBot