Protection of Marine and Inland Waters - Similarities and Differences
has assertion: assertion
has provenance: provenance
has publication info: pubinfo
type: Nanopublication
created: 2026-05-11T16:42:31.322+02:00
creator: RoCrateBot
type: FAIRDigitalObject
type: RoCrateNanopub

Ecology
type: DefinedTerm

Generation Service
type: Agent
type: Person

VIEWEG
type: organization

bibliographic reference
type: Concept

CNR-ISMAR
type: organization

water management system
type: Expression

ramming activity
type: Expression

activities
type: Concept

public authority
type: Domain

changes
type: Concept

management
type: Concept

Brussels
type: Place

system
type: Concept

management strategy
type: Phrase
norm score: 16.971279373368148
score: 13.0

similarity
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.88235294117647
score: 4.7

ecology
type: Domain
norm score: 50.0
score: 5.9

mathematical and computer sciences
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.10151708871126175

Brussels
type: Place
wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q239

computer operations and hardware
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.10151708871126175

e. g. threat
type: Phrase
norm score: 13.577023498694517
score: 10.4

water management system
type: Phrase
norm score: 8.616187989556137
score: 6.6

Fishing
type: IPTC
path: Lifestyle and leisure/Leisure/Recreational activities/Fishing

earth sciences
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.6548367738723755

assessment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 7.884856070087609
score: 6.3

assessment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

cumulative assessment
type: Phrase
norm score: 4.830287206266319
score: 3.7

earth sciences
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.6548367738723755

Environmental pollution
type: IPTC
path: Environment/Environmental pollution

difference
type: Concept
norm score: 5.097545626179987
score: 8.1

e. g. threat
type: Phrase
norm score: 13.446475195822455
score: 10.3

The following describes the current status of the implementation of the two Directives and will outline similarities and differences between them.
type: Sentence
norm score: 14.708520179372195
score: 16.4

water management system
type: Phrase
norm score: 8.7467362924282
score: 6.7

ecology
type: Domain
norm score: 50.0
score: 5.9

https://w3id.org/ro-id/74e4284b-0d25-4ebf-9f08-dcb900436f2a
name: The approach considers the entire catchment area and besides the management of chemical pollution takes also into account other anthropogenic pressures, such as structural changes and ecological degradation of waterbodies.
type: Sentence
norm score: 17.219730941704036
score: 19.2

management
type: Concept
norm score: 6.0415355569540585
score: 9.6

Fishing
type: IPTC
path: Lifestyle and leisure/Leisure/Recreational activities/Fishing

https://w3id.org/ro-id/7d0d697a-e925-4c0d-a979-9f7ae1ecaa33
name: The approach considers the entire catchment area and besides the management of chemical pollution takes also into account other anthropogenic pressures, such as structural changes and ecological degradation of waterbodies.
type: Sentence
norm score: 17.309417040358746
score: 19.3

pollution
type: Lemma
norm score: 8.51063829787234
score: 6.8

https://w3id.org/ro-id/8211fa48-ac18-450c-aa80-cfc2f7bf8530
name: This change of management strategy implemented through the Water Framework Directive (WFD) (and initiated in Brussels) continues within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires a cumulative assessment of land-based pressures in combination with the assessment of impacts from human activities at sea.
type: Sentence
norm score: 18.026905829596416
score: 20.1

pollution
type: Concept
norm score: 6.0415355569540585
score: 9.6

similarity
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.88235294117647
score: 4.7

https://w3id.org/ro-id/93b9b097-e050-4294-bb1e-3b734fd755ad
name: This change of management strategy implemented through the Water Framework Directive (WFD) (and initiated in Brussels) continues within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires a cumulative assessment of land-based pressures in combination with the assessment of impacts from human activities at sea.
type: Sentence
norm score: 18.026905829596416
score: 20.1

assessment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

Brussels
type: Place
wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q239

status of the implementation
type: Phrase
norm score: 6.005221932114882
score: 4.6

geology
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.6548367738723755

pollution
type: Lemma
norm score: 8.385481852315394
score: 6.7

mathematical and computer sciences
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.10151708871126175

The following describes the current status of the implementation of the two Directives and will outline similarities and differences between them.
type: Sentence
norm score: 14.708520179372195
score: 16.4

Marine Strategy Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 7.884856070087609
score: 6.3

pollution
type: Concept
norm score: 6.0415355569540585
score: 9.6

noise pollution
type: Concept
norm score: 4.782882315921963
score: 7.6

management
type: Lemma
norm score: 8.260325406758447
score: 6.6

difference
type: Concept
norm score: 5.097545626179987
score: 8.1

Water Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.757196495619524
score: 4.6

cumulative assessment
type: Phrase
norm score: 4.830287206266319
score: 3.7

assessment
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

Environmental pollution
type: IPTC
path: Environment/Environmental pollution

noise pollution
type: Lemma
norm score: 6.758448060075094
score: 5.4

management
type: Concept
norm score: 6.104468219005663
score: 9.7

management strategy
type: Phrase
norm score: 16.971279373368148
score: 13.0

noise pollution
type: Concept
norm score: 4.782882315921963
score: 7.6

geology
type: FieldOfResearch
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.6548367738723755

similarity
type: Concept
norm score: 3.713027061044682
score: 5.9

activity
type: Concept
norm score: 3.713027061044682
score: 5.9

management
type: Lemma
norm score: 8.260325406758447
score: 6.6

similarity
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

difference
type: Lemma
norm score: 7.008760951188986
score: 5.6

activity
type: Concept
norm score: 3.713027061044682
score: 5.9

status
type: Concept
norm score: 3.5871617369414723
score: 5.7

difference
type: Lemma
norm score: 7.008760951188986
score: 5.6

computer operations and hardware
type: NASA
norm score: 50.0
score: 0.10151708871126175

status of the implementation
type: Phrase
norm score: 6.005221932114882
score: 4.6

similarity
type: Concept
norm score: 3.6500943989930774
score: 5.8

status
type: Concept
norm score: 3.5871617369414723
score: 5.7

noise pollution
type: Lemma
norm score: 6.758448060075094
score: 5.4

service-account-enrichment
type: Agent

Protection of Marine and Inland Waters - Similarities and Differences
performs task: bibliographic reference
about: Ecology
content size: 7713
contributor: Generation Service
copyright holder: VIEWEG
creator: Generation Service
date created: 2018-06-20 11:17:49.345000+00:00
date modified: 2025-03-05 01:16:59.590103+00:00
date published: 2018-06-20 11:17:49.345000+00:00
description: The German water management system has changed during the last decade. Initially it was focussing on the management of chemical pollution in water bodies only. This has now shifted to a management system using a holistic approach. The approach considers the entire catchment area and besides the management of chemical pollution takes also into account other anthropogenic pressures, such as structural changes and ecological degradation of waterbodies. This change of management strategy implemented through the Water Framework Directive (WFD) (and initiated in Brussels) continues within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The MSFD requires a cumulative assessment of land-based pressures in combination with the assessment of impacts from human activities at sea. These include (e. g.) threats to fish stock, bycatch and habitat destruction through fishing activities, noise pollution through shipping and ramming activities as well as the operation of offshore wind farms. The following describes the current status of the implementation of the two Directives and will outline similarities and differences between them.
encoding format: application/ld+json
end time: 2010-01-01
license: no-permission
distribution category: Open access
type: ResearchObject
type: LiveRO
type: Dataset
type: BibliographyResearchObject
generated at time: 2010-01-01
domain: ecology
place: Brussels
concept: assessment
concept: difference
concept: management
concept: pollution
concept: noise pollution
concept: similarity
concept: activity
concept: status
field of research: earth sciences
field of research: geology
IPTC: Fishing
IPTC: Environmental pollution
lemma: similarity
lemma: Marine Strategy Framework Directive
lemma: pollution
lemma: management
lemma: Water Framework Directive
lemma: noise pollution
lemma: difference
NASA: mathematical and computer sciences
NASA: computer operations and hardware
phrase: management strategy
phrase: e. g. threat
phrase: water management system
phrase: cumulative assessment
phrase: status of the implementation
sentence: The following describes the current status of the implementation of the two Directives and will outline similarities and differences between them.

Water Framework Directive
type: Lemma
norm score: 5.757196495619524
score: 4.6

service-account-generation-service
type: Agent

sig
has algorithm: RSA
signed by: RoCrateBot